How early is too early to exercise? If it were possible to exercise pre-vested incentive stock options, imagine the tax savings. One of the big concerns for those facing a wealth event in private company stock is taxes. Timing is everything in exercising stock options. If you manage your company’s equity plan, you need to know about early exercise of Incentive Stock Options.
Whether planned or unplanned, retirement prior to age 65 may present an income gap until the qualifying age to receive pensions and Social Security. While stock administrators cannot offer financial planning advice, they need to know how taxation variables impact executives as they draw down company stock from a variety of accounts and compensation plans. The complexity surrounding stock-based compensation clouds the dilemma: Which funds should be drawn from to optimize the performance and minimize the tax consequences?
The cross-departmental nature of managing an equity plan can make gathering data and keeping up-to-date records a nightmare. There is no time more crucial than year-end to make sure you reconcile equity plan data across all of your internal stakeholders and departments.
Many private company employees holding stock options are looking for tax strategies prior to the company’s public offering. A lesser-known provision for pre-IPO options exercise allows employees holding ISO-options to lock in a lower pre-IPO price in order to minimize ordinary income taxes and start the capital gains period running during the pre-IPO period. Read on for more details surrounding HR 5719.
It’s not often that the worlds of professional sports and equity compensation intersect. True, I have a Google alert set up for “stock options” that sometimes returns articles about how the stock of football players impacts their career options (as in “Joe Schmo played really well in the last game; his stock is really rising”), but that’s not what I’m referring to. I’m talking about domestic mobility. While we are struggling with how compensation is taxed when employees travel from one state to another, this is an issue that professional sports has been dealing with for a long time now.
It has been a common complaint with SEC filers that they don’t see the value in XBRL submissions. There has even been proposed legislation to reduce the requirements for XBRL filings. The distaste towards interactive data is most likely an aversion to change – frustration with the mandate taking time out of their reporting process coupled with the fact that XBRL provides streamlined transparency into disclosures. However, as the data continues to standardize we continue to see new uses for machine readable financials.